1. Ones that worked. Specifically, what worked?
I feel that they all worked. They all helped to revise my project one way or another. Specific guidelines when peer editing is good because it gives you something to focus on when you read over your partners work. Although the questions which we created ouselves was a good idea too, we can usually tell which part of our project is weak. With someone looking over our work, we can fix sentence level errors, punctuation, and grammar.
2. How did they help you revise projects?
They helped by correcting errors as well as indicating where more information should be put (if necessary). If there is a paragraph that isn't really in depth, we can change it to be more specific. Reading outloud does correct sentence flow errors, so that definitely helps. Most importantly, just another person looking at your work and giving feedback is the best thing.
3. What ones didn't work? Be specific what didn't work or wasn't useful.
As stated above, I dont think the revision where we asked our own questions was that great. When we are reading over our project, we can tell where we may need editing. By asking these questions which we already know, there really is no point.
No comments:
Post a Comment